Labor law-scaffold cases

One of the most complex and confusing areas of the labor law concerns scaffold cases. Generally speaking a worker injured during a height related accident can bring a claim for negligence. Of course there are many obstacles that must first be overcome. A recent case in the Appellate Division took a look at some of these issue. In Leconte v. 80 East End Owners Corp, a building's owner and managing agent violated the scaffold law, and thus were liable for the injuries of a worker who fell while installing a security system in the building, regardless of whether the worker used one of the building's ladders and fell when a part of the ladder went through a gap in a stairway landing or did not use one of the building's ladders and instead fell from the stairway's railing. Under the latter version of events, the worker's alleged conduct was not the sole proximate cause of the accident, since he was not offered the use of the building's ladders to perform his work and did not know that he could, but chose not to, use the building's ladders. Under the former version of facts, moreover, the worker's allegedly negligent conduct in placing the ladder in a manner that allowed a part of it to go through a gap in the landing was not the sole proximate cause of his injuries.